The abuse cases of two priests in Arizona have cast further doubt on
the Catholic church's insistence that
Pope Benedict XVI played no role in
shielding pedophiles before he became pope.
Documents reviewed by The Associated Press show that
as a Vatican cardinal, the future pope took over the abuse case of the
Rev. Michael Teta of Tucson, Ariz., then let it languish at the
Vatican for years despite
repeated pleas from the bishop for the man to be removed from the
priesthood.
In another Tucson case, that of Msgr. Robert Trupia,
the bishop wrote to then-
Cardinal
Ratzinger, who would become pope in 2005. Bishop Manuel Moreno
called Trupia "a major risk factor to the children, adolescents and
adults that he many have contact with." There is no indication in the
case files that Ratzinger responded.
The details of the two cases come as other
allegations emerge that Benedict — as a Vatican cardinal — was part of a
culture of cover-up and confidentiality.
"There's no doubt that Ratzinger delayed the
defrocking process of dangerous priests who were deemed 'satanic' by
their own bishop," Lynne Cadigan, an attorney who represented two of
Teta's victims, said Friday.
The
Rev.
Federico Lombardi, a Vatican spokesman, called the accusations
"absolutely groundless" and said the facts were being misrepresented.
He said the delay in defrocking Teta was caused by a
hold on appeals while the Vatican changed regulations over its handling
of sex abuse cases. In the meantime, he said, cautionary measures were
in place; Teta had been suspended since 1990.
"The documents show clearly and positively that those
in charge at the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith ... have
repeatedly intervened actively over the course of the 90s so that the
canonic trial under way in the Tucson diocese could dutifully reach its
conclusion," Lombardi said in a statement.
In the 1990s, a church tribunal found that Teta had
molested children as far back as the 1970s, and the panel determined
"there is almost a satanic quality in his mode of acting toward young
men and boys."
The tribunal referred Teta's case, which included
allegations that he abused boys in a confessional, to Ratzinger. The
church considers cases of abuse in confessionals more serious than other
molestations because they also defile the sacrament of penance.
It took 12 years from the time Ratzinger assumed
control of the case in a signed letter until Teta was formally removed
from ministry, a step only the Vatican can take.
Teta was accused of engaging in abuse not long after
his arrival to the Diocese of Tucson in 1978. Among the eventual
allegations: that he molested two boys, ages 7 and 9, in the
confessional as they prepared for their
First Communion.
Teta was removed from ministry by the bishop, but
because the church's most severe punishment — laicization — can only be
handed down from Rome, he remained on the church payroll and was working
with young people outside the church.
In a signed letter dated June 8, 1992, Ratzinger
advised Moreno he was taking control of the case, according to a copy
provided to the AP from Cadigan, the victims' attorney. Five years
later, no action had been taken.
"This case has already gone on for seven years,"
Moreno wrote Ratzinger on April 28, 1997, adding, "I make this plea to
you to assist me in every way you can to expedite this case."
It would be another seven years before Teta was
laicized.
Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman, said Teta was
ordered defrocked in 1997. But Teta appealed, and the appeal remained on
hold until the new regulations took effect in 2001.
"Starting in 2001, all the appeals that were pending
were promptly taken up, and Teta's case was one of the first to be
discussed," Lombardi said.
But this still took time, he said, because the documentation that had
been presented was "especially voluminous." The sentence was upheld and
in 2004 Teta was laicized.
The case of Trupia shows the fragmented nature of how Rome handled such
allegations before 2001, when Ratzinger dictated that all abuse cases
must go through his Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith.
Before then, files were sent to varied
Vatican departments, as they were in the
case of Trupia. Moreno suspended Trupia in 1992, but again faced delays
from the Vatican in having him formally removed from the church.
Documents show at least two Vatican offices — the
Congregation for the Clergy and the
Apostolic Signatura, the
highest judicial authority of the
Catholic Church — were involved in the case
at least as early as 1995.
Moreno pleaded with the Congregation for the Clergy to do something,
writing, "We have proofs of civil crimes against people who were under
his priestly care" and warning Trupia could "be the source of greater
scandal in the future."
Ultimately, the case landed in Ratzinger's office.
On Feb. 10, 2003, a day after the
Arizona Daily Star reported that Trupia was
living in a condo near Baltimore, driving a leather-seated Mercedes-Benz
with a rosary hanging from the rearview mirror, Moreno wrote to
Ratzinger again.
Sick with
prostate cancer
and the beginning stages of Parkinson's disease, Moreno was approved
for early retirement by
Pope
John Paul II.
Before he was replaced, the bishop wrote Ratzinger yet again. Moreno's
replacement, Bishop Gerald Kicanas, sent similar requests to Ratzinger
and his subordinates.
"My experience — and as I've looked at the records in our serious cases —
the Vatican actually was prodding, through the Congregation of the
Doctrine of the Faith and
Cardinal
Ratzinger, to try to get this case going," Kicanas said.
Finally, in August 2004, Trupia was laicized.
"The tragedy is that the bishops have only two choices: Follow the
Vatican's code of secrecy and delay, or leave the church," Cadigan, the
victims' lawyer, said Friday. "It's unfortunate that their faith demands
that they sacrifice children to follow the
Vatican's directions."
Trupia's former attorney, Stephen A. Shechtel of Rockville, Md., said
Friday that he never dealt with the church on his client's behalf and
that Trupia was aware he would be defrocked and didn't fight it.
Bishop Gerald Kicanas, Moreno's replacement, defended the Vatican's
handling of the Arizona cases, citing the prolonged process of internal
church trials that he acknowledged could be "frustratingly slow because
of the seriousness of the concerns."
Kicanas said suggestions that Ratzinger resisted addressing the issues
of sexual abuse in the church were "grossly unfair."
"Cardinal Ratzinger, as the head of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,
was always receptive, ready to listen, to hear people's concerns,"
Kicanas said. "
Pope
Benedict is the same man."
David Mikael Taclino
Inyu Web Development and Design
Creative Writer