Of
course, Los Angeles won game #1 the way I expected – dominating at
home. Game two was much more like the typical Lakers-Celtics wars of
yesteryear – although nowhere near the scoring. Though the final margins
of the two games were similar, game #2 was far more competitive.
Having
watched both contests, I have a few thoughts.
Game 1: 67 Free Throw Attempts - Boooring!
Game 2: 67 Free Throw Attempts - Boooring!
As Ron
Artest goes, so go the Lakers
Artest was an abysmal
1-10 from the field, 1-6 from the arc and 3-8 from the line. It doesn’t
get much worse than that. He is important defensively, but you simply
can’t begin to overcome a -3 EFF in 40+ minutes!
I
don’t think I’ve ever discussed this yet on UFR. It’s one thing to get a
-3 in two minutes of action, but something entirely different in 40
minutes. If you add all the Lakers individual EFFs you get 106. Since
there are 240 man-minutes in a game, that means for each minute played
per person, they should have racked up .442 EFFs.
Since
Artest played 40:31, he should have had an 18 EFF to be consistent with
the team. Even worse, take his 40:31 out of the mix and you have 109
divided into 192 minutes. That’s .568 EFF per man minute. If he had done
as well as the rest of the team on a per-minute basis, he would have
had an EFF of 23.
I can assure you that if
he had a 23 instead of a -3, the Lakers would have won… easily. The loss
of this game falls at the feet of one person – Ron Artest.
What is
Artest doing jacking so many threes?
I
looked at the last 30 games that each of the players have played –
which includes 18 in the playoffs and the last dozen of the regular
season. Here is a stat that will make you quiver in your boots if you
are a Lakers’ fan.
COOL FACTOID: Ron Artest has taken
more three-point shots than Kobe Bryant over the last 30 games each has
played.
That might be ok if it was 2008 (38.0%) or
2009 (39.9%), but in 2010, he only shot 35.5% and over his last 30
games, he’s bricking them at 26.2%.
In Bryant’s last 30
games, he’s shooting treys at 40.3%! Huge difference. Here are the
three-point stats for Fisher, Bryant, Farmar and Artest over the last 30
games.
|
Player
|
Treys.Attempted
|
3pt%
|
|
Artest
|
145
|
26.2
|
|
Bryant
|
144
|
40.3
|
|
Fisher
|
96
|
36.5
|
|
Farmar
|
81
|
45.7
|
-
Can anyone explain to me what a non-ball
handling, defensive forward is doing shooting more threes than any of
the guards on the team – including Kobe Bryant – especially when he’s
only clanking them at 26% !?
It’s hard to believe
Jackson likes it, but you have to figure he probably tolerates it in
order to keep his (Artest’s) mind right.
Rajon Rondo was even better than Ray Allen
Rondo
will get some props because he is the flavor of the month for
the talking heads – not to mention a triple-double. But, most people
will certainly make the blanket assumption that Ray Allen won the game
for Boston. Although it was close by EFF, Rondo had a 28 and Allen a 26.
While
it is true that Allen outscored Rondo 32-19 – including a finals record
eight three-pointers on only 11 attempts, it’s also true that Rondo had
nine more rebounds and eight more assists!
Besides,
every one of those eight three-pointers came in the first three
quarters. LA had the lead after that. It was Rondo’s play down
the stretch that won the game for the Celtics.
Unquestionably,
the headline(s) will read… Ray Allen this, Ray Allen that. In fact, the
first person mentioned in every story I looked at was “Ray Allen”. It’s
just one more example (out of millions) where the public and the
reporter are fooled by scoring.
You will know (well, you
won’t know because you will be dead of old age) that reporting has
evolved when you see a game like this and the lead headline is “Rajon
Rondo leads Celtics to victory”.
EFFs for games 1 and 2
Los Angeles
|
Player
|
Game 1
|
Game 2
|
|
Gasol
|
32
|
37
|
|
Bryant
|
28
|
19
|
|
Artest
|
18
|
-3
|
|
Bynum
|
11
|
25
|
|
Fisher
|
10
|
10
|
|
Odom
|
6
|
6
|
|
Brown
|
5
|
4
|
|
Farmar
|
5
|
3
|
|
Vujacic
|
2
|
5
|
|
Walton
|
1
|
—
|
-
Boston
|
Player
|
Game 1
|
Game 2
|
|
Pierce
|
28
|
9
|
|
Rondo
|
14
|
28
|
|
Garnett
|
14
|
13
|
|
Wallace
|
12
|
12
|
|
Perkins
|
11
|
16
|
|
R.Allen
|
8
|
26
|
|
Davis
|
4
|
7
|
|
T.Allen
|
1
|
3
|
|
Finley
|
0
|
—
|
|
Robinson
|
—
|
7
|
|
Williams
|
—
|
-2
|
-
I don’t have a prediction
on game #3. However, I’m sticking with the Lakers winning the series.
It will be tough to win in six, having lost one of two at home, but I
still think they are the superior team.
One last item of
interest. On the way home, one of those brilliant late-night radio hosts
made a comment to this effect – meaning paraphrased: “I think it is
important that LA win at least one game in Boston because they have to
get back the home court advantage.”
Hey Sherlock! I’ve got
an even better reason why they need to win at least on game in Boston.
Because if they don’t… they will lose the series 4-1.
Inyu Web Development and Design Creative Writer
0 comments:
Post a Comment